Paalala ng Konsulado: Balik sa dati ang mga patakaran sa kontrata simula May 1

 

Ang abiso ng Konsulado tungkol sa pagbabalik sa normal ng mga patakaran para sa mga FDH

Nagpalabas ng paalala ang Konsulado na ang dating anim na buwang palugit o extension na binibigay sa mga kontratang magtatapos na, ayon sa dating pinahigpit na patakaran dahil sa pandemya, ay hindi na igagawad simula sa Mayo 1.

Ibig sabihin nito, kailangang pumirma na ng bagong kontrata ang employer at ang foreign domestic helper o putulin na ang kanilang ugnayan pagkatapos ng petsang ito.

PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE

Katulad ng dati, maari silang humiling na i-extend ang kanilang kontrata pero hindi na maaring lumampas pa ito ng isang buwan.

Pero kung ang kontrata ay magtatapos sa Abril 30 o mas maaga ay maaari pa ring hilingin ang dating binibigay na anim na buwang extension.

PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE

Ito ay alinsunod sa pagluluwag ng halos lahat ng mga patakaran kontra pandemya sa Hong Kong, na nangahulugan na hindi na mahirap pang makauwi ang isang FDH pagkatapos ng kanyang kontrata, at hindi na rin mahihirapang pumunta dito ang mga nasa kani-kanilang bansa pa pero nabigyan na ng visa.

PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE

Sa mga nabigyan naman ng permiso na hindi muna uuwi sa loob ng isang taon matapos ang kanilang kontrata, maari silang humingi muli ng extension kung ang huling araw ng kanilang visa ay tatapat sa April 30 o mas maaga pa.

BOOK YOUR FLIGHTS NOW! PRESS FOR DETAILS

Pero kung ang extension na binigay sa kanila noon ay matatapos sa May 1 o lampas sa petsang ito, kailangan na nilang umuwi o mag-exit sa loob ng itinakdang panahon dahil hindi na sila muling bibigyan ng palugit para makapanatili sa Hong Kong.

Dagdag pa ng Konsulado sa kanilang pahayag, alinsunod sa patakaran ng Hong Kong, ang mga FDH na magtatapos ng kanilang kontrata ay kailangang umuwi muna sa kanilang bansa bago mag-umpisang magtrabaho sa ilalim ng bagong kontrata.

PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE

Ang mga na-terminate naman ay kailangang umuwi sa loob ng 14 araw pagkatapos putulin (nila o ng kanilang employer) ang kanilang kontrata.

PADALA NA!

Call us!

PRESS FOR DETAILS

CALL US!

Rare dinosaur exhibition at Science Museum set to end Feb 22

One of the 8 dinosaur skeletons that can be viewed at the Science Museum exhibit

Skeletons of eight of the world's most iconic creatures that once flourished in the age of dinosaurs, rare fossil bones and some of the most complete fossil dinosaur skeletons now on display at the Hong Kong Science Museum can be seen only until Feb. 22.

This was announced by the government as it encouraged the public to view the rare exhibition for free, but with prior online registration.

The precious and impressive fossil collection has been sourced from museums and academic organisations in Germany, Switzerland, Italy, the Netherlands, Romania and Morocco.

PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE

Except for the Tyrannosaurus (which was brought here for an exhibition years back), the other seven fossil skeletons, including the Triceratops, Allosaurus, Hesperosaurus, Diplodocus, Spinosaurus, Hatzegopteryx and a baby Sauropod are on display in Hong Kong for the first time.

Because of their enormous size, a total area of around 2,000 square meters has been set aside for the exhibit, which offers an immersive experience through the use of multimedia projection techniques, lighting effects and the fusion of scientific research, paleontology artwork and unique scenography.

PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE

As the priceless collection known as the “Big Eight” exhibition is not likely to be under one roof again, everyone in Hong Kong is being urged not to miss this last chance to view the rare artifacts in one big swoop.

Since its launch in July last year, the exhibition has been viewed by more than 750,000 visitors.

More than750k people have viewed the rare exhibit since July last year

Guided tours in Cantonese are held at the museum during Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays, at three sessions per day.

During the one-hour guided tour, visitors are taken through the prehistoric world with the introduction of precious original fossils and scientific breakthroughs in each era, to reveal the unique anatomical structures and living habits of the prehistoric creatures.

Visitors can sign up for the tours on-site on a first-come, first-served basis.

PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE

Famous cartoon characters Chibi Maruko Chan and Hanawa Kun will guide special free “Weekend Safari Tours” in Cantonese in four sessions on Jan 28 (Saturday), January 29 (Sunday), February 12 (Sunday) and February 19 (Sunday) for children and adults.

On-site registration starts 15 minutes before each guided tour on a first-come, first-served basis. Interested parties may visit the FIF website www.fif.org.hk/meet-chibimarukochan for details.

BOOK YOUR FLIGHTS NOW! PRESS FOR DETAILS

Jointly presented by the Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD) and the First Initiative Foundation (FIF), and jointly organised by the Hong Kong Science Museum and the FIF, the exhibition is exclusively sponsored by the Hong Kong Jockey Club (HKJC); and supported by the MTR Corporation.

This is one of the many projects funded by HKJC’s donation of $630 million to the Government to mark the 25th anniversary of the establishment of the HKSAR.

PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE

All visitors are required to make an advance booking on the Internet. For details of e-bookings, exhibition content, guided tours and related programmes, please visit the website at big8dinosaurs.hk or call 2732 3232 for enquiries. Masks are required inside the museum.

PADALA NA!

Call us!

PRESS FOR DETAILS

CALL US!

62-year-old torture claimant fails bid to stop repatriation

By The SUN

High Court says applicant failed to show a real risk of her being seriously harmed or killed

A 62-year-old Filipina who came to Hong Kong as a tourist 16 years ago and overstayed, failed in her bid to get the High Court to give her more time to appeal the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board denying her right to remain in Hong Kong.

In his order issued on Thursday, Jan 19, Deputy High Court Judge Bruno Chan noted that applicant Emelita Arista was already five months late in filing the application for leave to appeal the decision.

The delay, said the Judge, must be considered “very substantial and inordinate,” apart from the fact that Arista did not provide an explanation as to why she failed to appeal against the TCAB’s decision on time.

PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE

In any case, Judge Chan said he did not find merit in Arista’s intended application for a Judicial review as she had failed to cite any proper ground for it.

“…as such, and in the absence of any error of law or irrationality or procedural unfairness in her process before the Board or in its decision being clearly and properly identified by the Applicant, I do not find any merits in her intended application either,” said the Judge.

He also stressed what the Court of Appeal has repeatedly said, that a judicial review does not serve as a rehearing of a refoulement claim, during which the applicant was given sufficient chance to present his or her case.

Pindutin para sa detalye

In such cases, the evaluation or the risk or harm to the claimant is primarily a matter for the Immigration Director and the Board, said the judge.

Arista, who was born in Manila and raised in Ilocos Sur, worked in Hong Kong as a foreign domestic helper from 1999 to 2003.

During this time, she heard of a land dispute between her father and a cousin, Ruel. She decided to confront Ruel about this during a vacation in the Philippines in the 2003, as a result of which he made threats against her.

PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE

After her father passed away in 2006, Ruel threatened to kill her if she did not surrender her part in the disputed land to him.

Fearing for her life, Arista fled to Manila and then to Hong Kong where she overstayed. She was arrested by the police in 2017, or more than 10 years later.

She subsequently filed a non-refoulement claim for protection on July 13, 2017 and attended a screening interview before the Immigration Department with legal representation from the Duty Lawyer Service.

 

BOOK YOUR FLIGHTS NOW! PRESS FOR DETAILS

On Aug 9, 2017 the Director of Immigration rejected he applicant’s claim, saying the level of risk of harm from Ruel was low, and that there was no reliable evidence of any real intention on his part to seriously harm or kill Arista.

In any event, said the Director, the dispute was a private matter among family members and there was no indication that the applicant would not be given state or police protection if she returned to the Philippines.

On the contrary, the Country of Origin Information (“COI”) on the Philippines shows that with its large population of more than 100 million spread across a vast territory of more than 300,000 square kilometers, it would not be difficult for the applicant to move to other parts of the country where it would be impossible for Ruel to locate her.

PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE

On Aug 25, 2017 she appealed the Director’s decision to the TCAB. Just over a  year later, or on Jul 31, 2018, the Board dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Director’s decision.

Arista did not take any further action until Apr 1, 2019 when she filed her Form 86 for leave to apply for judicial review of the Board’s decision. However, she cited no ground but merely attached a copy of the decision.

By then, she was already “seriously out of time with her application,” said the judge.

According to Order 53 rule 4(1) of the Rules of the High Court, an application for leave to apply for judicial review must be made within three months from the day when grounds for the application first arose, unless the court finds reasonable ground to extend the period.

PADALA NA!

Call us!

PRESS FOR DETAILS

CALL US!

Central retailer arrested for selling mercury-laden whitening creams

 By The SUN

A woman selling this product in Central has been arrested

Hong Kong Customs has again warned against the use of two types of whitening products carrying the brand name “Goree” – the same cream that sent two Filipina domestic helpers to the hospital in November last year due to suspected mercury poisoning.

A statement from Customs published Friday, January 20, said a 52-year-old female retailer selling the two banned products in Central was arrested, but was released on bail pending further investigations.

PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE

Customs said it did not rule out making further arrests.

Notice was also served on the retailer, ordering it to stop selling the unsafe products

The two products were identified as Goree Whitening Cream with Lycopene and Goree Day and Night Cream.

Pindutin para sa detalye

The Customs statement said that the two products “exceeded the maximum permitted limit by 22 000 and 21 000 times respectively, suspected to be in contravention of the Consumer Goods Safety Ordinance (CGSO).”

Further, the packages of the two products only bore warnings in English, without any Chinese translation, which contravened a related law, the Consumer Goods Safety Regulation.

PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE

In November, two Filipinas, aged 39 and 43 were taken to hospital and were found to have proteinuria, or the presence of excess proteins (or mercury) in urine, the likely result of their having used the two products for several months.

According to medical advice, chronic exposure to mercury can cause damage to the nervous system and kidneys.

BOOK YOUR FLIGHTS NOW! PRESS FOR DETAILS

Symptoms may include tremors, irritability, insomnia, memory deterioration, concentration difficulty, impaired hearing and vision, and a change in the taste function.

In severe cases, renal or kidney failure may occur.

Customs shows the Goree products seized from the woman selling them in Central

The Customs statement carried a warning particularly directed at employers to warn their FDHs against using the products- or stop them if they have already done so.

Customs also reminded the public not to buy beauty products of unknown composition, or from doubtful sources.

PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE

Those who have used the named beauty products should seek medical attention immediately if they feel unwell after use.

Members of the public with information relating to unsafe consumer goods may make a report via Customs' 24-hour hotline 2545 6182 or its dedicated crime-reporting email account (crimereport@customs.gov.hk).

PADALA NA!

Call us!

PRESS FOR DETAILS

CALL US!

Filipina mother & daughter lose bid to stop repatriation

 

The CA says allowing applications filed way beyond the deadline could lead to abuse

A Filipina former domestic helper and her seven-year-old daughter who had previously decided to abandon their non-refoulement application, failed to get the High Court to reopen their case.

In a judgement handed down Monday, Appeal Court justices Aarif Barma and Carlye Chu upheld the lower court’s decision to deny the applicants’ bid for a judicial review, as it was filed way beyond the deadline.

Applicants Reggie Cayanan Villanueva, 41, and her daughter, Gienish, had sought to get Judge Bruno Chan to allow them to challenge the Torture Claims Adjudication Board’s decision not to reopen their case as it was filed way out of time.

The two had earlier applied to abandon their resistance to being sent back to the Philippines, and after it was approved, changed their mind and asked the TCAB to restore their original non-refoulement claim.

But in doing so, they failed to make the application in time, and the CA said allowing them to pursue the case despite the time lapse could lead to abuse.

Villanueva, 41, who is married with two children in the Philippines, last arrived in Hong Kong to work as a foreign domestic helper on Aug. 23, 2014.

Shortly thereafter, she had an affair with an Indian man in Hong Kong, and got pregnant. She gave birth to Gienish on Aug. 5, 2015.

On Nov. 30, 2015 her contract was terminated but she did not go home within the mandatory 14 days. About four months later, or on Mar 15, 2016, she surrendered to authorities.

On Oct 5 of the same year she applied for non-refoulement, saying her husband would kill her and her daughter if they returned to the Philippines.

The Director of Immigration denied their application on Apr 27, 2017, saying there was just a low risk of mother and daughter coming to harm in the Philippines.

On May 10 of the same year, the applicants went to the TCAB to appeal against the Director’s decision.

But 10 months later, or on Mar 5, 2018,Villanueva wrote to both the Director and the Board, requesting to withdraw their appeal, stating that:

 “…We want to go back to our home country Philippines since it is safe for us to go back. I want to withdraw our non-refoulement claim appeal as soon as possible so that we can go back. I have no money to buy air ticket. Please arrange as soon as possible.”

The  Board promptly replied by letter dated Mar 13, 2018, informing the applicants that they had a week to reconsider their application. But once accepted their appeal would be dismissed.

As the applicants did not respond to the letter the Board informed them on Mar 21, 2018 that their request to withdraw their appeal was accepted.

However, on Apr 4, 2018, Villanueva wrote to the Board, saying she and her daughter wanted to reopen their appeal as her husband got angry on hearing of their plan to return to the Philippines.

The Board rejected the request on Apr 19, 2018, saying their appeal had already been disposed of, and that this action was final.

Villanueva’s subsequent application for leave to challenge this decision was also rejected by Judge Chan on the ground that the Board had become “functus officio” (or no longer in office) as soon as it decided to close the file on their case.

Again, Villanueva failed to appeal against this decision on time.

On Nov. 23, 2020, or seven weeks after the required 14-day period for appeal had lapsed, she filed for an extension of time, saying she did not know how to make the application and had no money to do so.

Judge Chan heard the application on Apr 20, 2021, and on May 4 of the same year, refused it.

In upholding his decision, the CA said:  “Had it been otherwise, not only would there be no finality in the determination of such claims, it could also lead to abuse by claimants who are desirous of delaying their removal from Hong Kong by making last minute withdrawals and then applying to reinstate or reopen the appeals…”

The appeal court added the judge was right in finding that the intended judicial review by both applicants has no reasonable prospect of success.