By Daisy CL Mandap
Immigration has stepped up repatriation since the last quarter of last year |
Among those being sent back at a faster rate
since the last quarter of 2022 are Filipinos, as can be gleaned from the spike
in the number of one-way travel documents being issued by the Consulate on a regular basis.
Late on Tuesday, a group of about 10 Filipinas who had
completed their sentences were taken to the Consulate by police officers so
they could have their travel documents readied ahead of their being sent back
to the Philippines.
PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE! |
Consul Paul Saret, head of the assistance to nationals
section, confirmed that there has been a marked increase in the number of
Filipinos being sent home in recent months.
The big bulk of the repatriates involves those who
failed to substantiate their claim against non-refoulement, or against being told
to return to their home country because of alleged threats to their life.
But Consul Saret said they also include overstayers
and other detainees who have already served their sentences.
PINDUTIN PARA SA DETALYE |
The uptick was the result of a major policy shift
approved by legislators in December which allows authorities to immediately expel
asylum seekers whose applications were rejected by Immigration even if they are
still awaiting the outcome of their appeal.
This was what happened in the case of Brudencio J. Bolanos,
who was sent back to the Philippines in October last year, five months before the
Court of Appeal could decide on his case.
A further 1,100 are said to be facing the same fate in
the near future. And if the trend continues, a big chunk of some 15,000 asylum
seekers still in Hong Kong could also find themselves in the same boat.
BOOK YOUR FLIGHTS NOW! PRESS FOR DETAILS |
The claimants are asking to be relocated to a third
country, as Hong Kong does not grant refugee status to asylum seekers. However,
there is just a slim chance that they will succeed, as over 99% of the claims
filed over the past decade have been rejected.
Previously, claimants were allowed to seek various
remedies after failing to get the Immigration Department’s approval for them to
stay and be processed for possible asylum in a third country.
First, they could seek remedy at the Torture Claims
Appeal Board. If this also fails, they could file for leave for a judicial
review at the High Court of the decision to deny them non-refoulement.
Pindutin para sa detalye! |
If still unsuccessful, appellants can progressively
launch legal challenges at various levels of court, all the way to the Final
Court of Appeal.
The lenient but more universally accepted approach to handling the claims has led to courts being clogged with judicial review cases.
According to a report recently
furnished to the Legislative Council, a total of 2,537 JR cases were pending
before the Court of First Instance in 2021, or 60 times the number in 2014.
As they were previously allowed to stay before the completion of the appeal or judicial procedures, a total of 14,819 claimants were residing in Hong Kong at the end of 2021.
Among them, 64% were male and
36% were female, and included around 470 children under the age of 5.
PADALA NA! |
PRESS FOR DETAILS |
CALL US! |